JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. MCCOY, et al
| JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
| PAUL B. MCCOY and BARBARA C. MCCOY |
| 1:2009cv00288 |
| April 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| Condemnation Office |
| Alamance |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| UNASSIGNED |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 43:945a Complaint in Condemnation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 2/26/2010. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11) is GRANTED, that judgment be entered by default against Defendants awarding Plaintiff a perpetual easeme nt and right-of-way over, upon, across and under the property identified in the complaint to construct a transmission line consisting of one or more wires attached to poles for the purpose of transmitting electric power, and that Defendants be awarded Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($6,300.00) for the easement. A separate Judgment will be entered contemporaneously. (Solomon, Dianne)
|
|
Filing
15
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 1/12/2010, that Plaintiff's summary judgment motion (pldg. # 11 ) be granted as filed and that a default judgment of condemnation be entered. (Lloyd, Donna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
