UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JERRY B. CLAYTON, et al
||UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
||JERRY B. CLAYTON, DEBORAH P. CLAYTON, ALLENE S. CLAYTON, EDWIN L. CLAYTON, MARIA D. CLAYTON, KEN A. CLAYTON and GAIL A. CLAYTON
||March 11, 2010
||North Carolina Middle District Court
||WALLACE W. DIXON
||THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||26:7401 IRS: Tax Liability
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 13, 2011
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re: 43 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. IT IS ORDERED that the Government has ten (10) calendar days within which to file an amendment to its complaint to set forth its claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C). If the Government does so, Claytons Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (Doc. 43 ) will be deemed DENIED, and Clayton will have ten (10) calendar days from the filing of any amended complaint within which to file an answer; if the Government fails to timely file an amended complaint, the court will grant Claytons motion for judgment on the pleadings as to claims for tax years 2002 through 2006. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 12/13/2011.(Solomon, Dianne)
|January 6, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The court finds that a genuine dispute of material fact exists for trial. Clayton's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 51 ) is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 1/6/2012. (Solomon, Dianne) .
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.