COCHRAN, et al v. VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, et al
| LAWRENCE HODGE, RAYMOND C. MARCOTTE, LEE ROY MOORE, JOE F. MORGAN, BRYAN D. MUTCHIE, PRESTON NALE, AL NORDEN, ORCUTT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC, GEORGE J. ELLIOTT, RONALD S. EBERHART, RICHARD COCHRAN, RICHARD COWAN, MIKE FAUSTINI, ROY HALL, JR. and CHIP HERRON |
| VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC and VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC. |
| 1:2011cv00927 |
| October 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| UNASSIGNED |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Diversity |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 06/02/2014, that the Defendant Volvo's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (Doc. 131 ) is GRANTED and all claims of Plaintiffs Frank Beatty III, Ronnie Chosewood, Tom Dougherty, Mark Eb el, Mike Faustini, Wayne Fox, Lawrence Hodge, Semio Express, Inc., and Harvey West be and are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(d) and 41(b), for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
133
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 05/28/2014, that Defendant Volvo's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions [Doc. # 131 be GRANTED, and that all claims of Plaintiffs Frank Beatty III, Ronnie Chosewood, Tom Dougherty, Mark Ebel, Mike Faustini, Wayne Fox, Lawrence Hodge, Semio Express, Inc., and Harvey West be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(d) and 41(b).(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 04/22/2013, that Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, (Doc. 68 ), is DENIED.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 03/01/2013. This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Seal Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Class Certification, (Doc. 70 ), and Def endant's unopposed motion to seal its brief in opposition to the same motion for class certification and certain exhibits. (Doc. 74 .) A hearing on the motions was held on February 20, 2013. ORDERED that to the extent the motions seek b lanket sealing of the briefs and exhibits, they are denied. To the extent the motions seek to redact the motions and the exhibits, the Court will reserve ruling. No later than ten days from the date of this Order, the parties may file on the publi c record briefs and exhibits in redacted form and depositions in excerpt and/or redacted form, a motion to be allowed to file the briefs and exhibits in redacted form, evidence in support of the motion, and a short brief addressing the interests a dvanced by the parties in light of the public interests and the duty of the courts. The Court would also appreciate a proposed order which includes the kind of proposed findings required by the case law. The briefs and exhibits filed under seal will remain under seal for the time being. (Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
