KAWA v. DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS

Plaintiff: WILLIAM F. KAWA
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS
Case Number: 1:2012cv00184
Filed: February 23, 2012
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Office: NCMD Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Referring Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 17, 2013 25 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER signed on 5/17/2013. For the reasons stated herein, it is RECOMMENDED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 16 ) be GRANTED.(Daniel, J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KAWA v. DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM F. KAWA
Represented By: NORMAN B. SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS
Represented By: KIMBERLY JOYCE LEHMAN
Represented By: CHARLES MATTHEW KEEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.