DAVIS v. DUNCAN, et al
| WILLIAM C. DAVIS |
| MARK J. DUNCAN and TRIAL AND ERRORS, INC. |
| 1:2012cv00262 |
| March 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| UNASSIGNED |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 04/27/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21 ) be GRANTED as to Counts 2 and 3 of Plaintiff's Complaint, but be DENIED as to Count 1. FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 23 ) as to Count 1 be DENIED. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 03/31/2015; that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 21 ] be granted as to Counts 2 and 3 of Plaintiff's Compla int, but be denied as to Count 1. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 23 ] as to his Count 1 be denied. ORDERED that discovery is extended to May 29, 2015, and the Clerk is directed to set this matter on a trial calendar based on that deadline for the close of discovery. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
