APEX IMAGING SERVICES INC V. JOSEPH SCOTT CAMPBELL ET AL
||DOES and JOSEPH SCOTT CAMPBELL
||APEX IMAGING SERVICES INC
||December 26, 2012
||North Carolina Middle District Court
||XX US, Outside State
||JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 7, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 8/7/2013, that Campbell's Motions to Consolidate Case Nos. 12-CV-01365 and 12-CV-01366 and to Stay or Dismiss Case No. 12-CV-01365 (Doc. # 20 in case number 1:12-CV-1365 & (Doc. # 37 ) in case number 1:12-CV-1366] are hereby GRANTED and the present dispute between Campbell and Apex shall proceed in case number 1:12-CV-1366 only. FURTHER, that case number 1:12-CV-1365 is DISMISSED WITHOUT < b>PREJUDICE. FURTHER the Apex's Motion to Transfer Venue to the Southern District of Illinois (Doc. # 28 ) in case number 1:12-CV-1366] is DENIED. FURTHER that Campbell's Motion to Strike Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Transfer (Doc. # 41 ) in case number 1:12-CV-1366] is DENIED AS MOOT. FINALLY, that the Motion to Dismiss the Second Claim for Unfair and Deceptive Acts or Practices (Doc. # 20 ) in case number 1:12-CV-1366] is GRANT ED and Campbell's Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Campbell filing a Motion Seeking Leave to Amend his Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.