PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC. v. AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit North Carolina Middle District PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC. v. AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC.

PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC. v. AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC.

Plaintiff:	PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC.
Defendant:	AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC.
Case Number:	1:2013cv00181
Filed:	March 4, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Forsyth
Presiding Judge:	L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2014	Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 3/28/2014; that Defendant's Motion to Compel Written Discovery and 30(b)(6) Deposition (Docket Entry 42 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that, on or before April 4, 2014, Pl aintiff shall serve Defendant with a statement setting out the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, Plaintiff incurred in opposing the instant Motion. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this order will result in denial of any cost-shifting. FURTHER that, if Plaintiff timely serves Defendant with a statement of its reasonable expenses, Defendant shall file, on or before April 18, 2014, either: 1) a Notice indicating its and/or its counsel's agreement to pay the claimed expenses; or 2) a Memorandum of no more than five pages explaining why Defendant contests the reasonableness of the claimed expenses, along with a certification that Defendant attempted in good faith to resolve any disagreement over the reasonableness of the claimed expenses. Failure by Defendant to comply with this order will result in the Court ordering, upon the filing of a Notice by Plaintiff of its reasonable expenses as contained in the statement it served upon Defen dant, the payment of such expenses by Defendant. FURTHER that, on or before April 25, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a Response of no more than five pages to any Memorandum timely filed by Defendant contesting the reasonableness of the clai med expenses. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this order will result in denial of any expenses contested by Defendant as unreasonable. FURTHER that, on or before April 30, 2014, Defendant may file a Reply of no more than three pages to any Response timely filed by Plaintiff regarding the reasonableness of the claimed expenses. FURTHER that, upon completion of the foregoing briefing or the time for such briefing, the Clerk shall refer this matter back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further action. (Sheets, Jamie)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2014

Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 3/28/2014; that Defendant's Motion to Compel Written Discovery and 30(b)(6) Deposition (Docket Entry 42 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that, on or before April 4, 2014, Pl aintiff shall serve Defendant with a statement setting out the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, Plaintiff incurred in opposing the instant Motion. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this order will result in denial of any cost-shifting. FURTHER that, if Plaintiff timely serves Defendant with a statement of its reasonable expenses, Defendant shall file, on or before April 18, 2014, either: 1) a Notice indicating its and/or its counsel's agreement to pay the claimed expenses; or 2) a Memorandum of no more than five pages explaining why Defendant contests the reasonableness of the claimed expenses, along with a certification that Defendant attempted in good faith to resolve any disagreement over the reasonableness of the claimed expenses. Failure by Defendant to comply with this order will result in the Court ordering, upon the filing of a Notice by Plaintiff of its reasonable expenses as contained in the statement it served upon Defen dant, the payment of such expenses by Defendant. FURTHER that, on or before April 25, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a Response of no more than five pages to any Memorandum timely filed by Defendant contesting the reasonableness of the clai med expenses. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this order will result in denial of any expenses contested by Defendant as unreasonable. FURTHER that, on or before April 30, 2014, Defendant may file a Reply of no more than three pages to any Response timely filed by Plaintiff regarding the reasonableness of the claimed expenses. FURTHER that, upon completion of the foregoing briefing or the time for such briefing, the Clerk shall refer this matter back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further action. (Sheets, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC. v. AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC.
Represented By:	BRYAN T. SIMPSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?