WILLIAMSON v. COLVIN
CAROLYN DENISE WILLIAMSON |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2014cv00884 |
October 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
L. PATRICK AULD |
CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 5/2/2016. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be vacated and that the matter be remanded u nder sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings as to why, for purposes of establishing an RFC, restricting Plaintiff to simple, routine, and repetitive tasks not involving production work but allowing for goal -oriented work adequately accounts for her moderate limitation in concentration, persistence, or pace (or, alternatively, whether additional restrictions should apply and/or whether jobs that can accommodate any such additional restrictions exist in substantial numbers). As a result, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 18 ) should be granted in part (i.e., to the extent it requests remand) and Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 21 ) should be denied. (Daniel, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.