UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVA-ROCINCUET

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit North Carolina Middle District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVA-ROCINCUET

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVA-ROCINCUET

Petitioner:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:	ROGER M. NAVA-ROCINCUET
Case Number:	1:2014mc00067
Filed:	November 19, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
Presiding Judge:	WILLIAM L. OSTEEN
Presiding Judge:	JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 22, 2015	Filing 9 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 04/22/2015, that due to Respondent's compliance and no further action nor documentation is needed at this time, this matter is terminated. (Taylor, Abby)
January 22, 2015	Filing 4 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON PETITION TO ENFORCE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/22/2015. RECOMMENDED that the Petition (Docket Entry 1 ) be GRANTED and that an Order be entered compelling Respondent Roger M. Nava-Rocincuet to obey the Internal Revenue Service Summonses served on him on July 22, 2014, by appearing on March 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., before Revenue Officer Cynthia D. Cooke, at 1677 Westbrook Plaza Drive Winston-Salem, North Carolina to testify and to produce for examination documents and records as described in the Summonses. ORDERED that the United States Marshal for this District serve a copy of this Order personally upon Roger M. Nava- Rocincuet, within 14 days of the date of this Order.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 22, 2015

Filing 9 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 04/22/2015, that due to Respondent's compliance and no further action nor documentation is needed at this time, this matter is terminated. (Taylor, Abby)

January 22, 2015

Filing 4 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON PETITION TO ENFORCE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/22/2015. RECOMMENDED that the Petition (Docket Entry 1 ) be GRANTED and that an Order be entered compelling Respondent Roger M. Nava-Rocincuet to obey the Internal Revenue Service Summonses served on him on July 22, 2014, by appearing on March 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., before Revenue Officer Cynthia D. Cooke, at 1677 Westbrook Plaza Drive Winston-Salem, North Carolina to testify and to produce for examination documents and records as described in the Summonses. ORDERED that the United States Marshal for this District serve a copy of this Order personally upon Roger M. Nava- Rocincuet, within 14 days of the date of this Order.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVA-ROCINCUET
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	JOAN BRODISH BINKLEY(Designation United States Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: ROGER M. NAVA-ROCINCUET
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?