McCrory et al v. State of North Carolina et al
Brenda S. Clark and Carol C. McCrory |
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper and Elaine F. Marshall |
1:2014cv00065 |
March 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Buncombe |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 10/10/2014. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 10/10/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh) |
Filing 15 ORDER denying 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay of Proceedings and to Grant Summary Judgment on Merits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby STAYED pending the Supreme Courts disposition of Bostic, whether by denial of the petition for a writ of certiorari, or by a grant of such petition and a judgment by the Court. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 08/25/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 8 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/19/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb) |
Filing 10 ORDER that Defts have until 6/10/2014 to answer or otherwise respond to 1 Complaint; Pltfs have until 5/12/2014 to respond to 8 MOTION to Stay; Defts have 3 days from the date Pltfs file their response to Motion to Stay to file a reply; (see Order for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/2/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.