West v. Buncombe County NC Dept of HHS CPS et al
| Nathaniel G. West |
| Amanda Stone, Buncombe County, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Child Protective Services, Abigail Owoloti and Vanessa Hill |
| 1:2014cv00088 |
| April 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Buncombe |
| Dennis Howell |
| Max O. Cogburn |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order of Dismissal dated 9/29/2014. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 6 & 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Vanessa Hill, Buncombe County, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Child Protective Servi ces, Abigail Owoloti. IT IS ORDERED that all further proceedings in this action, including all discovery, are STAYED pending the District Judge's ruling on this Memorandum and Recommendation and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 09/03/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) Objections to M&R due by 9/22/2014(thh) Modified docket text on 9/3/2014, NEF regenerated (thh).
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER re 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Pla's Responses due by 7/25/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/23/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(klb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
