Radchyshyn v. Allstate Indemnity Company
Plaintiff: Mykhailo Radchyshyn
Defendant: Allstate Indemnity Company
Counter_claimant: Allstate Indemnity Company
Counter_defendant: Mykhailo Radchyshyn
Case Number: 1:2014cv00169
Filed: July 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Buncombe
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 26 Motion to Intervene; denying 29 Motion to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/5/2015. (kby)
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER denying 21 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 05/04/2015. (klb)
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that the parties shall, on or before April 22, 2015 confer, as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), and conduct an initial attorneys conference and within five (5) days thereafter the parties shallcomplete and file a Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 04/08/2015. (klb)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re 12 Certification of Initial Attorneys Conference and Discovery Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 09/30/2014. (klb)
September 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER accepting 6 Memorandum and Recommendation. Dft's 6 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Pla's Chapter 75 claim is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 09/08/2014. Copy of Order mailed to Atty Stephen Barnwell at address listed on docket sheet. (klb) Modified text on 9/8/2014 (klb).
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION granting 4 Motion to Dismiss Count Two. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 08/19/2014. (klb) Modified text on 8/19/2014 (klb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Radchyshyn v. Allstate Indemnity Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mykhailo Radchyshyn
Represented By: Stephen Barnwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allstate Indemnity Company
Represented By: John T. Jeffries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Allstate Indemnity Company
Represented By: John T. Jeffries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Mykhailo Radchyshyn
Represented By: Stephen Barnwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?