Foster v. Fisher et al
Plaintiff: Jennifer Nicole Foster
Defendant: Amanda Fisher and Jack Van Duncan
Case Number: 1:2014cv00292
Filed: November 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Buncombe
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 61 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 3/9/2016. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (khm)
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ORDER: ORDER that all further proceedings in this action, including all discovery, are STAYED pending the District Judge's ruling on this Memorandum and Recommendation and Order. MEMORAN DUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 41 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Amanda Fisher, Calvin Hill, 43 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Jack Van Duncan, 48 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by John Doe ( Objections to M&R due by 7/6/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/17/2015. (khm)
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Leave to Amend; administratively denying as moot without prejudice Defendant 25 "Jack Van Duncan's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/11/15. (khm)
February 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Pro Se Access to Electronic Filing. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/11/15. (khm)
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying as moot without prejudice 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/22/2015. (nv)
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying as moot 12 Motion for Entry of Default and Motion for Default Judgment; denying without prejudice 13 Motion for Leave to Amend; denying 14 Motion to allow Pro Se Electronic Filings, however the Court will grant the Plaintiff the right to receive notice via e-mail whenever a pleading or other paper is filed electronically in this matter. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 01/12/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foster v. Fisher et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Nicole Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amanda Fisher
Represented By: Grady L. Balentine, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Van Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?