Pappas et al v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Evanthia F Pappas and Michael R Dean
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2010cv00016
Filed: January 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER that the hearing scheduled for 3/1/2012 re: Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs is hereby CANCELLED. The Court will defer ruling pending resolution of the Appeal. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 2/22/2012. (tmg)
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 JUDGMENT in favor of Evanthia F Pappas, Michael R Dean against United States of America. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/13/11. (clc)
December 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying 51 Motion to Strike Proposed Voir Dire Question No. 8. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/7/2011. (tmg)
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER (Jury Trial re-set for 12/12/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/26/2011. (tmg)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 21 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/14/2011. (tmg)
July 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for the reasons stated in the July 29, 2010 hearing. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/30/2010. (cw)
July 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.( Motion Hearing set for 7/29/2010 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen.) Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/7/2010. (cw)
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting Permission to File Surreply as to 6 Motion to Dismiss. Surreply due 5/15/2010. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/14/2010. (tmg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pappas et al v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evanthia F Pappas
Represented By: E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael R Dean
Represented By: E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?