Chisolm v. Biomet, Inc. et al
| Yolanda Chisolm |
| Biomet, Inc. and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2014cv00268 |
| May 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David S. Cayer |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| Diversity - Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 24 Second Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to File Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Case Settlement Deadline 8/7/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/27/2020. (mek)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Thomas Roe Frazer, II for Yolanda Chisolm; granting 19 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Thomas Roe Frazer, III for Yolanda Chisolm. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/12/19. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(tob)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Erica Kay Drew for Biomet, Inc.; granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Matthew T. Albaugh for Biomet, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/13/19. (tob)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Stay pending its transfer to MDL No. 2391 in the USDC for the Northern District of Indiana. Further, it is ordered that defendant Biomet, Inc.'s time to answer the Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended until 5 days after this action has been transferred to MDL No. 2391. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/28/2014. (chh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
