United States of America v. DC Contractors, Inc. et al
| United States of America |
| DC Contractors, Inc. and SureTec Insurance Company |
| 4:2013cv00120 |
| October 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Northwestern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Daniel L. Hovland |
| Charles S. Miller |
| Miller Act |
| 02 U.S.C. ยง 431 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2015 at 1:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 12/16/2013 at 10:30 AM CST by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. The court will initiate the conference call. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 12/13/2013 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 33 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Clayton C. Utkov. (KT) NEF regenerated to Utkov on 11/12/2013. (rm)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 31 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Timothy J. Herman. (BG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
