Vata v. Arden Courts
Plaintiff: Constantin Vata
Defendant: Arden Courts
Case Number: 1:2008cv02469
Filed: October 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Gaughan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting re 2 Motion to dismiss On the Basis of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Or, In the Alternative, Due to Claim Preclusion filed by Arden Courts. Accordingly, this action is dismissed. The court cetifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/19/08. (E,P)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vata v. Arden Courts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constantin Vata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arden Courts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?