Godles v. Erdie Industries, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Jeffrey Godles
Defendant: Erdie Industries, Inc. and Jason Erdie
Case Number: 1:2013cv00607
Filed: March 20, 2013
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Lorain
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Godles v. Erdie Industries, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Godles
Represented By: James A. DeRoche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erdie Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew A. Crampton(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Susan L. Gragel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Erdie
Represented By: Andrew A. Crampton(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Susan L. Gragel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.