State of Ohio v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
| State of Ohio and Michael DeWine |
| United States Army Corps of Engineers, John M McHugh, Jo-Ellen Darcy, Thomas P. Bostick, Richard G. Kaiser and Karl D Jansen |
| Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority |
| 1:2015cv00679 |
| April 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 101 . The defendant's cross motion for summary judgment 104 is denied. The Defendant is ordered to the pay costs associated with the confined disposal facility of all dredged sediment from the 2015 Cleveland Harbor Dredging Project. Such payment shall be authorized and arranged by the Secretary of the United States Army and/or the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. Judge Donald C. Nugent 5/4/17(C,KA)
|
|
Filing
69
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Complete the Record (Related Doc # 60 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent on 11/25/15.(G,CA)
|
|
Filing
33
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injuction. (Related documents, 25 , 28 ) Judge Donald C. Nugent on 5/12/15. (R,JM) Modified text incorrect event links added on 5/13/2015 (E,P).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
