Johnson-Romaker v. Kroger
Plaintiff: Audrey Johnson-Romaker
Defendant: Kroger
Case Number: 3:2007cv03271
Filed: October 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: James G. Carr
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Order granting defendant's Motion for summary judgment. (Related Doc # 24 ). Judge James G. Carr on 3/4/2009.(S,AL)
September 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Order : Defendant's Motion in limine is overruled, without prejudice. (Related Doc # 19 ). Judge James G. Carr on 9/15/2008.(S,AL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson-Romaker v. Kroger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Audrey Johnson-Romaker
Represented By: Thomas A. Sobecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?