Rice v. Kellermeyer Company

Plaintiff: Ronald Rice
Defendant: Kellermeyer Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv00263
Filed: February 6, 2013
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Toledo Office
County: Wood
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Helmick
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29:2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 15, 2014 48 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order Re: 33 Motion for summary judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Kellermeyer Company. Defendant Kellermeyer's motion for summary judgment is denied. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/15/14. (SG,D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rice v. Kellermeyer Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Rice
Represented By: Kera L. Paoff
Represented By: John D. Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kellermeyer Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.