Meacham, etal. vs. City of Akron, etal.
| John S Meacham and Barbara Meacham |
| City of Akron Department of Planning and Urban Development, City of Akron, c/o Mayor Donald Plusquellic and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development |
| 5:2009cv01053 |
| May 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
Judgment Entry that for the reasons contained in the Memorandum Opinion 43 filed contemporaneously with this Judgement Entry, defendant's motion for judgment on the record (ECF 23 ) is Granted. This case is closed. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. Signed Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 9/29/2010. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
16
Judgment Entry that for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order 15 filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, the motion to dismiss defendants City of Akron, and City of Akron Department of Planning and Urban Development, ECF 7 , is Granted. The defendants City of Akron and City Department of Planning and Urban Development are dismissed from this case. Copy of entry mailed to HUD on 7/24/2009. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 7/23/2009. (M,De)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
