Barclay v. Tibbles

Barclay v. Tibbles

Petitioner:	Mark Barclay
Respondent:	Terry Tibbles
Case Number:	5:2013cv00124
Filed:	January 17, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Summit
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 1, 2019	Filing 32 Judgment Entry: The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 31 . Judge Sara Lioi on 5/1/2019. (P,G)
February 28, 2014	Filing 13 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court overrules petitioner's objections and adoptes the R&R. (Doc. No. 11 .) Grounds one and two of the petition are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1631. Ground three is dismissed. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/28/2014. (P,J)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 1, 2019

Filing 32 Judgment Entry: The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 31 . Judge Sara Lioi on 5/1/2019. (P,G)

February 28, 2014

Filing 13 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court overrules petitioner's objections and adoptes the R&R. (Doc. No. 11 .) Grounds one and two of the petition are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1631. Ground three is dismissed. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/28/2014. (P,J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barclay v. Tibbles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Barclay
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Terry Tibbles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?