Roth v West Salem Police Dept.

Defendant: West Salem Police Department
Plaintiff: Kenneth Roth
Case Number: 5:2013cv00330
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Akron Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 1, 2014 40 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion: Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on all of plaintiff's claims. Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 26 ) is granted and this case shall be dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/1/2014. (P,J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roth v West Salem Police Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: West Salem Police Department
Represented By: John D. Latchney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Roth
Represented By: Richard N. Selby, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.