The Smitten Kitten, Inc. v. Fernandez
The Smitten Kitten, Inc. |
Mike Fernandez |
1:2010cv00663 |
September 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Michael R. Barrett |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Smitten Kitten, Inc. (Ita, Amy) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Michael R. Barrett: Status Conference held on 8/9/2011; Amy Ita appeared on behalf of Plaintiff; counsel informed the Court that Plaintiff intends to file dismissal. (jlw) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Please be aware that a Status Conference is set for 8/9/2011 at 1:30 PM to be conducted by teleconference before Judge Michael R. Barrett; parties shall initiate contact with the Court by calling 513-564-7660 five minutes prior to 1:30 pm. (eh1) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Service by Publication. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/7/11. (ba1) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Service by Publication by Plaintiff Smitten Kitten, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Ita Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit Ita Affidavit Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit Ita Affidavit Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit Ita Affidavit Exhibit C, # 5 Affidavit Pokopac Affidavit) (Ita, Amy) |
Notice of Correction re: 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING A TRADEMARK. PDF was corrected. An unsigned version was inadvertently docketed. Once detected, was signed and re-docketed. No further action is required. (mr1) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING A TRADEMARK re 2 Complaint. (mr1) (mr1). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mike Fernandez. (mr1) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan. (mr1) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Smitten Kitten, Inc. (Ita, Amy) Modified to edit text for party name on 9/27/2010 (mr1). |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Mike Fernandez (Filing fee $350 paid - receipt number: 0648-2799190), filed by Smitten Kitten, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Summons Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C) (Ita, Amy) Modified to edit text for party name on 9/27/2010 (mr1). |
Filing 1 [FORMER DOCUMENT 1] CERTIFICATE of Clerk : Certified mailing of summons and complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jlw1) Modified to remove PDF on 9/24/2010 (jlw1). |
Notice of Correction re: 1 Certificate of Clerk document was filed on incorrect case. It will be refiled on case 10-cv-564. (jlw1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Smitten Kitten, Inc. v. Fernandez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Smitten Kitten, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Amy Ruth Ita |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mike Fernandez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.