PNC Bank, National Association v. Cook
||PNC Bank, National Association
||Edward Cook, Marlene Cook and Goodman & Goodman
||December 5, 2012
||Ohio Southern District Court
||Michael R. Barrett
||Stephanie K. Bowman
|Nature of Suit:
||Real Property: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Petition for Removal
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 8, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The petition for removal of a state court action to this federal court should be DENIED. 2. This matter should be dismissed from the docket of the Court. 3. This matter should be REMANDED back to the state court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). 4. The Court should certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be take n in good faith and therefore deny Mr. Cook leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Mr. Cook should also be advised that he remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/8/13. (mee) Modified to correct link on 1/8/2013 (mee).
|September 11, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Cook's 8 Objections are OVERRULED. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for removal of the state court action to this federal court is DENIED. 2. This matter is DISMISSED from the do cket of this Court. 3. The matter is REMANDED back to the state court. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 that any appeal of this Order adopting the Report would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, Cook is denied leave to appeal In forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/11/13. (lk)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System