Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC et al v. Fifth Third Bank
| Autoscribe Corporation and Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC |
| Fifth Third Bank |
| 1:2014cv00175 |
| February 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Plaintiffs Autoscribe Corporation, Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Gingo, Nicholas) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint; Fifth Third Bank answer due 6/26/2014. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/16/14. (ba1)
|
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 6/26/2014. by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Sherman, Adam) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Fifth Third Bank answer due 5/27/2014. (eh1)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 5/27/2014. by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A Proposed Order) (Whitaker, Glenn) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint; Fifth Third Bank answer due 4/24/2014. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 4/10/14. (ba1)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 4/24/2014. by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Sherman, Adam) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam C Sherman for Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Sherman, Adam) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Wade Richardson for Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Richardson, Eric) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn Virgil Whitaker for Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Whitaker, Glenn) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Laura A. Kenneally, Gabriel I. Opatken and Robert A. Vitale for Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/18/14. (ba1)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Laura A. Kenneally, Gabriel I. Opatken, Robert A. Vitale, Jr. (Filing fee $ 600, receipt number 0648-4483897) by Plaintiffs Autoscribe Corporation, Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Kenneally Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Opatken Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Vitale Certificate of Good Standing) (Fleming, Kyle) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Fifth Third Bank. Fifth Third Bank served on 3/4/2014, answer due 3/25/2014. (Gingo, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (lk) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Fifth Third Bank. (lk) |
| ***If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (lk) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Autoscribe Corporation. (Johnson, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC. (Johnson, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Fifth Third Bank ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-4459089), filed by Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC, Autoscribe Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Pat. No. 7,117,171, #2 Exhibit 2 - Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Form) (Johnson, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
