totes Isotoner Corporation v. R G Barry Corp

Plaintiff: totes Isotoner Corporation
Defendant: R G Barry Corp
Case Number: 2:2013cv00253
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Columbus Office
County: BUTLER
Presiding Judge: Gregory L Frost
Referring Judge: Norah McCann King
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 7, 2013 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 6/7/13. (sem1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: totes Isotoner Corporation v. R G Barry Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: totes Isotoner Corporation
Represented By: David Edward Schmit
Represented By: Ann Gallagher Schoen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R G Barry Corp
Represented By: Gerald Paul Ferguson
Represented By: Kimberly Weber Herlihy
Represented By: John M Kuhl
Represented By: Joseph R Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.