Cranel, Incorporated v. Pro Image Consultants Group, LLC et al
| Cranel, Incorporated |
| Pro Image Consultants Group, LLC, Richard Morin and Frank Damico |
| 2:2013cv00766 |
| August 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| DELAWARE |
| Mark R. Abel |
| James L Graham |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER granting 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 40 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 9/29/2014. (ds)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 54 Motion for Protective Order and denying 54 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 07/17/2014. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
24
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 12/11/2013. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part 8 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 12/9/13. (jcw1)
|
|
Filing
22
AGREED ORDER COMPELLING DEFENDANTS TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND ENJOINING DEFENDANTS' FROM DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE. The parties have agreed to resolve the matters raised in Cranel's Motion through an agreed order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 12/26/2013. (sr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
