Kiker v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Kathryn Kiker |
Smithkline Beecham Corporation |
2:2014cv02164 |
November 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Terence P Kemp |
Edmund A Sargus |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 205 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 08/01/2017. (dh1) |
Filing 137 ORDER - The Court construes 136 Motion to File Document Under Seal as seeking leave to file redacted versions of responses on the public record. Plaintiffs shall file redacted versions of their responses (Docs 115 , 116 , and 117 ) within three days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 11/17/2016. (agm) |
Filing 114 ORDER granting 113 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 5/18/2016. (agm) |
Filing 112 ORDER denying 111 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 5/16/2016. (agm) |
Filing 106 ORDER granting 104 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 4/25/2016. (agm) |
Filing 67 OPINION AND ORDER denying 51 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and granting Plaintiffs' request to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/30/2015. (dh1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.