Leesemann et al v. Lowes Home Centers,Inc et al
| Marietta Hail-Leesemann and Gregory H. Leesemann |
| Lowe's Home Centers Inc, John Doe, First Source Employee Management Inc and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield |
| 3:2013cv00068 |
| March 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 24 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. # 6 ); OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR HEARING AS MOOT (DOC. # 23 ); DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO REMAND CASE TO CLARK COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 09/13/13. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying as moot 23 MOTION for Hearing filed by Marietta Hail-Leesemann, Gregory H. Leesemann, and granting 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Marietta Hail-Leesemann, Gregory H. Leesemann. Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 8/26/13. (slo1)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER - The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiffs to file, on or before May 31, 2013, a Motion to Amend their Complaint with their proposed AmendedComplaint attached. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 5/17/2013. (kf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
