Mideast Machinery Movers, Inc. v. Pneu-Mech Paint Facilities, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Mideast Machinery Movers, Inc.
Defendant: Pneu-Mech Paint Facilities, LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00116
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: CLARK
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Mideast Machinery Movers, Inc. against Pneu-Mech Paint Facilities, LLC. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5/27/15. (ep)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mideast Machinery Movers, Inc. v. Pneu-Mech Paint Facilities, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mideast Machinery Movers, Inc.
Represented By: Phillip Raphael Garbig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pneu-Mech Paint Facilities, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?