United States of America v. Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Section 31, Township 13 North, Range 24 East, Less the SW/4 NE/4 NE/4 and less the SW/4 SE/4 NE/4 [Tract One], et al.
| United States of America |
| Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Section 31, Township 13 North, Range 24 East, Less the SW/4 NE/4 NE/4 and less the SW/4 SE/4 NE/4 [Tract One], Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Sections 30 and 31, Township 13 North, Range 24 East of the IBM [Tract Two], Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Section 16, Township 13 North and Range 22 East of the IBM [Tract Three] and Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma consisting of 3 acres in Section 15, Township 13 North, Range 22 East [Tract Four] |
| 6:2008cv00019 |
| January 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Sequoyah |
| Kimberly E. West |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Section 31, Township 13 North, Range 24 East, Less the SW/4 NE/4 NE/4 and less the SW/4 SE/4 NE/4 [Tract One], et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Wallace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Section 31, Township 13 North, Range 24 East, Less the SW/4 NE/4 NE/4 and less the SW/4 SE/4 NE/4 [Tract One] | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Sections 30 and 31, Township 13 North, Range 24 East of the IBM [Tract Two] | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma in Section 16, Township 13 North and Range 22 East of the IBM [Tract Three] | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real property holdings in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma consisting of 3 acres in Section 15, Township 13 North, Range 22 East [Tract Four] | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
