Valdivia et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Defendant: Sallisaw, City of and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Luz M. Valdivia
Case Number: 6:2011cv00177
Filed: May 19, 2011
Court: Oklahoma Eastern District Court
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Sequoyah
Presiding Judge: James H. Payne
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valdivia et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sallisaw, City of
Represented By: Betty Outhier Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Kevin S. Hoskins
Represented By: Robert D. Hart
Represented By: Lauren N. Donald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luz M. Valdivia
Represented By: Harry G. Scoufos, IV
Represented By: Thomas W. Condit
Represented By: Harry G. Scoufos, IV
Represented By: Thomas W. Condit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.