Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Vision Bank

Defendant: Vision Bank
Plaintiff: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Case Number: 6:2012cv00107
Filed: March 9, 2012
Court: Oklahoma Eastern District Court
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Pontotoc
Presiding Judge: Frank H. Seay
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 4, 2012 44 Opinion or Order of the Court ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: administratively closing the case (terminates case) (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
April 24, 2013 65 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge James H. Payne, dismissing/terminating case (cjt, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Vision Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vision Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Represented By: Patrick M. Ryan
Represented By: Phillip G. Whaley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.