Sweeney v. Social Security Administration

Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Lisa M. Sweeney
Case Number: 6:2013cv00124
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: Oklahoma Eastern District Court
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Sequoyah
Referring Judge: Steven P. Shreder
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2014 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : The decision of the ALJ is hereby REVERSED and the case is hereby REMANDED pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C 405(g) for further adminstrive proceedings. 19 Report and Recommendation (acg, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sweeney v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa M. Sweeney
Represented By: Davis Duty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.