Hovinghoff v. Moham
Petitioner: Bobbie Hovinghoff
Respondent: Rickey Moham
Case Number: 6:2015cv00075
Filed: February 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Okmulgee
Presiding Judge: Kimberly E. West
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Granting 14 respondent's Motion to Dismiss for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability and this action is, in all respects DISSMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hovinghoff v. Moham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bobbie Hovinghoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rickey Moham
Represented By: Diane L. Slayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?