KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Plaintiff: KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. and K-POWERNET, L.L.C.
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 4:2009cv00684
Filed: October 22, 2009
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Adair
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Represented By: R Stratton Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: K-POWERNET, L.L.C.
Represented By: R Stratton Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: William Patrick Tunell, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.