Milkus v. Glanz et al
| Michael Milkus |
| Stanley Glanz, Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management Inc. and Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv00120 |
| February 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| John E Dowdell |
| T Lane Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 1 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell Defendant Stanley Glanz's Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Brief in Support (Doc. 6) is denied. The parties are directed to file a joint status report within 21 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Thereafter, the Court will enter a scheduling order. In addition, the Court Clerk is directed to correct Plaintiff's name in the case caption in accordance with this Opinion and Order. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Status Report due by 3/25/2014); denying 6 Motion to Dismiss Party (Re: 1 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
