Alcala v. Dowling
Petitioner: Michael Thomas Alcala
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Case Number: 4:2014cv00185
Filed: April 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; adding party Jason Bryant terminating party Janet Dowling (Warden of the James Crabtree Correctional Center) ; denying certificate of appealability; denying 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (pll, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alcala v. Dowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Thomas Alcala
Represented By: Steven Michael Presson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Represented By: Diane L Slayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?