Stratford Holding LLC v. Foot Locker Retail Inc et al
||Fog Cap Retail Investors LLC, Kyser Koncepts Ltd, Arthur B Kyser, Timothy W Kyser, Deborah Manneck and Foot Locker Retail Inc
||Stratford Holding LLC
||July 10, 2012
||Oklahoma Western District Court
||Oklahoma City Office
||XX US, Outside State
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 8, 2013
ORDER motions to dismiss filed by Foot Locker 96 and Fog Cap 93 are granted in part and denied in part; the partial motion to dismiss filed by Kyser defendants 94 is granted and the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Fog Cutter 95 is denied ; Stratford's claims asserted under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act against Foot Locker, Fog Cap, the Kyser defendants, Green and Chunga are dismissed with prejudice; plaintiff's CERCLA and pendent state law claims remain for resolution...see order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 10/08/2013. (lam)
|August 1, 2014
ORDER denying 156 and 162 as Fog Cutter has not demonstrated the good cause required under Rule 55(c) to warrant relief...motions to vacate and to file answers out of time are denied. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 08/01/2014. (lam)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.