Maxwell v. Lane
Carlos Terrill Maxwell |
Reese Lane |
5:2013cv00145 |
February 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Payne |
Stephen P. Friot |
Suzanne Mitchell |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSING for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 1 Application for a Writ of Mandamus filed by Carlos Terrill Maxwell, DEEMING MOOT 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Carlos Terrill Maxwell. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 8/13/13. (llg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Maxwell v. Lane | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Reese Lane | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Carlos Terrill Maxwell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.