Maxwell v. Lane
Petitioner: Carlos Terrill Maxwell
Respondent: Reese Lane
Case Number: 5:2013cv00145
Filed: February 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Payne
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Suzanne Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSING for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 1 Application for a Writ of Mandamus filed by Carlos Terrill Maxwell, DEEMING MOOT 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Carlos Terrill Maxwell. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 8/13/13. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxwell v. Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Reese Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carlos Terrill Maxwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?