Lee et al v. ConocoPhillips Company
| Robert E Lee, Jr, Hitch Land & Cattle Company and Suzanne V Landess |
| ConocoPhillips Company |
| ConocoPhillips Company |
| Hitch Land & Cattle Company, Suzanne V Landess, Robert E Lee, Jr and Marvin R Mathis |
| 5:2014cv01391 |
| December 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Texas |
| Timothy D. DeGiusti |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER denying 95 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint; denying as moot 103 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/30/16. (ml)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER denying [67 and 72] Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 85 Motion for Leave to Correct Misstatements in Landowners' Closing Arguments. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/5/2016. (mb)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Remand to State Court; denying 32 Motion to Remand to State Court; and denying 38 Motion in Limine. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 08/20/15. (wh)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER the Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order entered by the District Court of Texas County, Oklahoma is hereby dissolved effective 12/30/2014.. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/20/2015. (mb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
