Harry and David v. ICG America Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Harry and David v. ICG America Inc.

Harry and David v. ICG America Inc.

Plaintiff:	Harry and David
Defendant:	ICG America Inc.
Case Number:	1:2008cv03106
Filed:	October 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Medford Office
County:	Jackson
Presiding Judge:	Owen M. Panner
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 22, 2010	Filing 70 ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION: Granting Motion for Partial Judgment on Harry and David's counterclaims for trademark infringement[69}; plaintiff awarded $10,001 in damages, plus costs accrued and reasonable attorney fees. Defendan t to file w/ court and serve on plaintiff, w/in 30 days, a sworn written report setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied w/ this injunction. Ordered & Signed on 12/21/10 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (See attached pdf for complete information.) (kf)
September 7, 2010	Filing 59 ORDER: ICG America and Hickory Farms Joint Motion to Consolidate 47 is DENIED, without prejudice to refiling following resolution of any dispositive motions. The parties shall coordinate discovery. Plaintiff shall by 01/10/2011, submit a letter s etting out issues which could be briefed jointly in dispositive motions, and defendant shall by 01/17/2011, submit a letter with the same information. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and Signed on 09/07/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 22, 2010

Filing 70 ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION: Granting Motion for Partial Judgment on Harry and David's counterclaims for trademark infringement[69}; plaintiff awarded $10,001 in damages, plus costs accrued and reasonable attorney fees. Defendan t to file w/ court and serve on plaintiff, w/in 30 days, a sworn written report setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied w/ this injunction. Ordered & Signed on 12/21/10 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (See attached pdf for complete information.) (kf)

September 7, 2010

Filing 59 ORDER: ICG America and Hickory Farms Joint Motion to Consolidate 47 is DENIED, without prejudice to refiling following resolution of any dispositive motions. The parties shall coordinate discovery. Plaintiff shall by 01/10/2011, submit a letter s etting out issues which could be briefed jointly in dispositive motions, and defendant shall by 01/17/2011, submit a letter with the same information. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and Signed on 09/07/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harry and David v. ICG America Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harry and David
Represented By:	Jeffrey Stewart Love
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ICG America Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?