Johnson v. Belleque

Petitioner: Martin Allen Johnson
Respondent: Brian Belleque
Case Number: 3:2007cv00779
Filed: May 25, 2007
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Mosman
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 3, 2011 123 Opinion or Order of the Court Order. The Court will enter the attached Proposed Order dismissing Petitioner's unexhausted federal habeas claims 30 days from the date of this Order unless Petitioner moves through his appointed counsel to stay his Petition pursuant to the three-step stay and abeyance procedure set out in Kelly and Taylor. Signed on 10/03/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment) (bb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Belleque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Martin Allen Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Belleque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.