Beyer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Paula J. Beyer
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2009cv01006
Filed: August 25, 2009
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Judge: Dennis J. Hubel
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 6, 2011 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Anna J. Brown. The Court ADOPTS in part the Findings and Recommendation 24 , GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Stipulation 23 for EAJA Fees, and AWARDS Plaintiff's counsel $5,090.01 in attorneys' fees as calculated in Exhibit 1 to this Order. See attached Order for full text. (bb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beyer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula J. Beyer
Represented By: Richard A. Sly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Adrian L. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.