Baker-Griffin v. Commissioner of Social Security
||Tiffeni S. Baker-Griffin
||Commissioner of Social Security
||May 31, 2011
||Oregon District Court
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
|Cause of Action:
||42:0405g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 31, 2012
ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 20 . Attorney fees in the amount of $5,477.70 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Order for details. Signed on 8/31/2012 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
|March 19, 2013
ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's (unopposed) Motion for Attorney Fees 25 . Attorney fees in the amount of $11,693.00 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff's attorney pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court finds this is a reasona ble fee. Previously, this court awarded $5,477.70, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the § 406(b) check, the agency is directed to subtract the amount previously awarded under the EAJA, and to send to Plaintiff's attorney at his current address shown above the balance of $6,215.30, minus any user fee. Any amount withheld (including the EAJA fee offset) after all administrative and court attorneys fees are paid should be released to the claimant. Signed on 3/19/2013 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.