Zeggert v. Summit Stainless Steel, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Zeggert v. Summit Stainless Steel, LLC

Zeggert v. Summit Stainless Steel, LLC

Plaintiff:	Christopher Zeggert
Defendant:	Summit Stainless Steel, LLC
Case Number:	3:2013cv00016
Filed:	January 3, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	Paul Papak
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 10, 2014	Filing 55 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 50 . The Court GRANTS Summit's motion for summary judgment as to Zeggert's IIED claim, Dkt. 32 . The Court DENIES AS MOOT Summit's motion for summa ry judgment on Zeggert's workers' compensation claim based on Zeggert's stipulation of withdrawal and abandonment of this claim, Dkt. 32 . The Court DISMISSES this case with prejudice. Signed on 7/10/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
June 24, 2013	Filing 23 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to disqualify pro hac vice counsel 13 is Denied. Such denial is without prejudice to Zeggert's right to file a similar motion at a later stage of these proceedings should he obtain new, substantial evidence of a conflict of interest that would merit disqualification under the legal framework discussed (within this opinion). Signed on 6/24/13 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 10, 2014

Filing 55 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 50 . The Court GRANTS Summit's motion for summary judgment as to Zeggert's IIED claim, Dkt. 32 . The Court DENIES AS MOOT Summit's motion for summa ry judgment on Zeggert's workers' compensation claim based on Zeggert's stipulation of withdrawal and abandonment of this claim, Dkt. 32 . The Court DISMISSES this case with prejudice. Signed on 7/10/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

June 24, 2013

Filing 23 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to disqualify pro hac vice counsel 13 is Denied. Such denial is without prejudice to Zeggert's right to file a similar motion at a later stage of these proceedings should he obtain new, substantial evidence of a conflict of interest that would merit disqualification under the legal framework discussed (within this opinion). Signed on 6/24/13 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zeggert v. Summit Stainless Steel, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Summit Stainless Steel, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Zeggert
Represented By:	David C. Force
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?