Wickenkamp v. Hampton et al
| Mary Wickenkamp |
| John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, Bruce Hampton, Scott Hampton, D. Rahn Hostetter, Venese Hampton, D. Zachary Hostetter and Rebecca A. Knapp |
| 3:2013cv00152 |
| January 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS the Motion 35 to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (5) of Defendants D. Rahn Hostetter, D. Zachary Hostetter, and Rebecca J. Knapp, GRANTS the Motion 44 to Dismiss of Defendant Scott Hampton, and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Rahn Hostetter, Zachary Hostetter, Knapp, and Scott Hampton. Signed on 02/24/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 7 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
5
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 1 and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies noted above no la ter than February 28, 2013. The Court advises Plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint by February 28, 2013, that cures such deficiencies shall result in the final dismissal of this proceeding without prejudice. See attached 6 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
