United States of America v. One Smith and Wesson Revolver, CAL .38, Serial Number AFM8093 et al

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Smith and Wesson Revolver, CAL .38, Serial Number AFM8093 and 56 Rounds of Ammunition
Case Number: 3:2013cv00343
Filed: February 28, 2013
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Malcolm F. Marsh
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 18:981 Civil Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One Smith and Wesson Revolver, CAL .38, Serial Number AFM8093 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Amy E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Smith and Wesson Revolver, CAL .38, Serial Number AFM8093
Represented By: Ronald D. Howen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 56 Rounds of Ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.